[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#58597: marked as done (base-config: Unpacks but does not configure packages.)



Your message dated 21 Feb 2000 09:58:40 -0000
with message-id <20000221095840.6178.qmail@master.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#58597: fixed in base-config 0.20
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Feb 2000 02:53:09 +0000
Received: (qmail 20244 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2000 02:53:08 -0000
Received: from bittersweet.inetarena.com (209.102.107.172)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 21 Feb 2000 02:53:08 -0000
Received: (from karlheg@localhost)
	by bittersweet.inetarena.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-6) id SAA07280;
	Sun, 20 Feb 2000 18:53:00 -0800
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 18:53:00 -0800
Message-Id: <200002210253.SAA07280@bittersweet.inetarena.com>
From: "Karl M. Hegbloom" <karlheg@bittersweet.inetarena.com>
Subject: base-config: Unpacks but does not configure packages.
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.2.9

Package: base-config
Version: 1.0-7
Severity: normal

 I don't know if this belongs to `base-config' or to `tasksel'.

 Useing a home-made CD from a fresh mirror (as of 2000.02.20) and a
 CVS home-built copy of boot-floppies, I ran a test install into a
 `vmware'.

 After selecting "simple", and picking a few things in `tasksel', it
 started unpacking things, etc.  I configured a few things with
 `debconf', and it continued...  It unpacked a bunch of stuff, and
 then suddenly I had a blue dialog screen of `base-config'(?)
 finishing up prior to dropping me at the "login" prompt.

 After I logged in, I found that none or many of the packages had been
 configured.  I needed to run `dpkg --configure --pending'.  I don't
 know if there had been an `apt' error or what...  it didn't stop so I
 could read any error prints; it flipped up the dialog without a
 pause.


-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.2
Kernel Version: Linux bittersweet 2.2.14 #3 Tue Jan 18 11:39:58 PST 2000 i586 unknown

Versions of the packages tasksel depends on:
ii  libc6          2.1.3-2        GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
ii  slang1         1.3.9-1        The S-Lang programming library - runtime ver
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 58597-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Feb 2000 09:58:41 +0000
Received: (qmail 6181 invoked by uid 1057); 21 Feb 2000 09:58:40 -0000
Date: 21 Feb 2000 09:58:40 -0000
Message-ID: <20000221095840.6178.qmail@master.debian.org>
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
To: 58597-close@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#58597: fixed in base-config 0.20

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
base-config, which has been installed in the Debian FTP archive:
base-config_0.20.tar.gz
  to dists/potato/main/source/admin/base-config_0.20.tar.gz
  replacing base-config_0.19.tar.gz
base-config_0.20.tar.gz
  to dists/woody/main/source/admin/base-config_0.20.tar.gz
  replacing base-config_0.19.tar.gz
base-config_0.20.dsc
  to dists/potato/main/source/admin/base-config_0.20.dsc
  replacing base-config_0.19.dsc
base-config_0.20.dsc
  to dists/woody/main/source/admin/base-config_0.20.dsc
  replacing base-config_0.19.dsc
base-config_0.20_i386.deb
  to dists/potato/main/binary-i386/admin/base-config_0.20.deb
  replacing base-config_0.19.deb
base-config_0.20_i386.deb
  to dists/woody/main/binary-i386/admin/base-config_0.20.deb
  replacing base-config_0.19.deb

Note that this package is not part of the released stable Debian
distribution.  It may have dependencies on other unreleased software,
or other instabilities.  Please take care if you wish to install it.
The update will eventually make its way into the next released Debian
distribution.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 58597@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org> (supplier of updated base-config package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.6
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 20:41:32 -0800
Source: base-config
Binary: base-config
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.20
Distribution: frozen unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
Description: 
 base-config - Debian base configuration package
Closes: 58594 58597 58598
Changes: 
 base-config (0.20) frozen unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * The "left holding the bag" release.
   * Fixed hostname in file:/ URI problem. Closes: #58594
   * Default contrib to true if they select non-free.
   * After tasksel, now installs packages via
     /usr/lib/dpkg/methods/apt/install. This handles packages that fail to
     install, etc, and is already well tested since it's used in dselect.
     If it returns a nonzero exit code, ask the user if they want to try again.
     Closes: #58597
   * Clean up dbootstrap droppings in the form of /etc/pcmcia and
     /lib/modules/`uname -r`/pcmcia, which are not registered with dpkg.
     Closes: #58598
Files: 
 766a1480df012196646223b626ed9945 523 admin optional base-config_0.20.dsc
 8d23a81de403fa77d64fc741aa7b6fc7 28175 admin optional base-config_0.20.tar.gz
 9a5ba9b3f1402f2e929a4ea9f61ede9b 33446 admin optional base-config_0.20_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE4sMzi2tp5zXiKP0wRAr/5AKCkcWIDwQiO4KYSdWDm0kLiJGPXGwCeMCst
Xm677/IzGml32+cNQRB9e1g=
=ldWm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: