Re: debian 2.1r3 needed and release team coordination
Turbo Fredriksson <email@example.com> writes:
> >>>>> "Adam" == Adam Di Carlo <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Adam> IMHO, we should be thinking about Debian 2.1r3. This is
> Adam> what I think needs to be in Debian 2.1r3 and why we need it:
> Adam> * replace kernel-source 2.2.1 pkg with 2.2.5 or better
> Adam> Rationale: 2.2.1 is very evil
> I got a 2.2.5-ac3 kernel package ready at
Does that fix the Adaptec problems?
> This kernel also have the /proc/.config patch applied, which I
> think would be good if we include in ALL of our future kernels.
What is that exactly?
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>