Re: resc1440tecra ok but image?
On Thu, Mar 04, 1999 at 07:19:58PM +0200, Fabrizio Polacco wrote:
> I just tested the 2.1.8 set of disks, and resc1440tecra.bin
> boots ok on my Thinkpad600.
> That's good.
> The initial page tells that the kernel is
> kernel-image 2.0.36-scsind
> but my mirror doesn't report this package.
As with the old tecra ones, that's a custom kernel Herbert build and
uploaded to incoming, just for the boot-floppies team, not for the FTP
> I have not checked the drv disk, as I suppose it also have pcmcia.
> As above my mirror does not have a pcmcia-modules for that kernel.
> >From the various test I made I noticed that if I didn't install
> those custom packages, then a subsequent upgrade can put a too-big
> kernel, or non working pcmcia.
It shouldn't. The base system doesn't contain a kernel-image package, nor
a pcmcia-modules package, so there's no way for an upgrade to install one
unless the user selects it himself.
> Has someone tested this aspect?
> | email@example.com firstname.lastname@example.org email@example.com
> | 6F7267F5 fingerprint 57 16 C4 ED C9 86 40 7B 1A 69 A1 66 EC FB D2 5E
> | firstname.lastname@example.org gsm: +358 40 707 2468
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org
Enrique Zanardi email@example.com