[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Blends pages, tasks pages etc.

Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> writes:
> On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 01:23:12PM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote:
>> * For packages in NEW, the ITP and the git repository would still as
>>   useful as for the "packaging started" section. Is there a reason, by
>>   blendtasktools doesn't keep them?
> I guess I simple wrote the ftpnew importer before I had the idea to also
> fetch these data.  For sure it is relevant - I think I need to store
> this information in UDD.

They are alredy fetched for the "started" packages, so one would just
need to (re-)enable them for the NEW packages, right?

>> * d/u/metadata contains fields for the upstream RCS and upstream bug
>>   repository. Can they be read out by blendtasktools?
> Currently the only data imported from d/u/metadata are the publication
> data.  I agree that in the long run everything should be imported.

If you would point me to the place where this is done in bdt.py, I could
do this as well.

>> * Can I get the number of RC bugs and the total number of bugs via
>>   blendtasktools? This would significantly increase the usability :-)
>>   Also, the CI test result would be great here.

> Yes.  Left column of
>    http://blends.debian.org/med/bugs/bio.html
> or similar.

I will take the bug info from there -- what about CI?

I am still not sure in how much this all duplicates the QA pages: does
it really make sense to have blends-private Todo-Lists and
blends-private Bugs pages with an interface totally different from the

Best regards


Reply to: