Re: Blends pages, tasks pages etc.
Andreas Tille <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 01:23:12PM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote:
>> * For packages in NEW, the ITP and the git repository would still as
>> useful as for the "packaging started" section. Is there a reason, by
>> blendtasktools doesn't keep them?
> I guess I simple wrote the ftpnew importer before I had the idea to also
> fetch these data. For sure it is relevant - I think I need to store
> this information in UDD.
They are alredy fetched for the "started" packages, so one would just
need to (re-)enable them for the NEW packages, right?
>> * d/u/metadata contains fields for the upstream RCS and upstream bug
>> repository. Can they be read out by blendtasktools?
> Currently the only data imported from d/u/metadata are the publication
> data. I agree that in the long run everything should be imported.
If you would point me to the place where this is done in bdt.py, I could
do this as well.
>> * Can I get the number of RC bugs and the total number of bugs via
>> blendtasktools? This would significantly increase the usability :-)
>> Also, the CI test result would be great here.
> Yes. Left column of
> or similar.
I will take the bug info from there -- what about CI?
I am still not sure in how much this all duplicates the QA pages: does
it really make sense to have blends-private Todo-Lists and
blends-private Bugs pages with an interface totally different from the