There was a typo in my previous mail.
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 12:43 AM, Akshita Jha <
zenith158@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Andreas Tille <
andreas@an3as.eu> wrote:
> >
> > > Another
> > > option could be to ignore the duplicated package (implying the package
> > > which comes second) and keep inserting other packages in the table. But,
> > > the problem here can be that the first package we get (the package which is
> > > inserted), is older than the one that is ignored. What do you think is a
> > > better implementation ?
> >
> > The latter is better since it only affects one package and not the whole
> > set of packages in the queue. We could even try to find out which
> > instance of the duplicate is the newer one since we usually have a
> > version number attached. I'd take the later version number and throw a
> > warning into the importer log.
> >
>
> I've sent a patch implementing this. If there is a duplicate patch, the package which has the latest chlog_date is inserted in UDD. I am assuming this is the latest package. Please test and confirm.
>