Hi, On Friday 04 April 2008 15:38, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, vagrant@freegeek.org wrote: > > i think it's worth making the distinction between: > > > > * completely within debian > > > > * making progress towards being entirely within debian > > > > * little to no intention of being completely within debian > > You are right that these are distinctive features of three > different things. The question is how you would like to measure > these features. The first one is easy, but the second and third are > hard to measure. Is it enough if people claim to have this feature? The first one is not that easy as well. What does "within Debian" mean? Stable? Unstable? Volatile? Proposed updates? Are rebuild backports from the same sources allowed? Or do you need to take the binaries from Debian? regards, Holger
Attachment:
pgpuv13YVuRGP.pgp
Description: PGP signature