Re: custom vs. derivative
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 05:12:29PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On Friday 04 April 2008 15:38, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, vagrant@freegeek.org wrote:
>> > i think it's worth making the distinction between:
>> >
>> > * completely within debian
>> >
>> > * making progress towards being entirely within debian
>> >
>> > * little to no intention of being completely within debian
>>
>> You are right that these are distinctive features of three
>> different things. The question is how you would like to measure
>> these features. The first one is easy, but the second and third are
>> hard to measure. Is it enough if people claim to have this feature?
>
>The first one is not that easy as well. What does "within Debian" mean?
>Stable? Unstable? Volatile? Proposed updates? Are rebuild backports from the
>same sources allowed? Or do you need to take the binaries from Debian?
Debian is what Debian defines as Debian. What you can apply the strict
logo to.
I agree that "within Debian" is vague. But "completely within Debian"
is not ambiguous to me.
I have no interest in working on the other terms.
- Jonas
- --
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
- Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFH+8wMn7DbMsAkQLgRAoOBAJ4t6YXBwv6qnxR6E/tqVoc91x0SjACgqM/U
AGdL3K5xAz7vCLbvoJlWhFc=
=T80e
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: