Re: [Jeff Squyres <jsquyres@lam-mpi.org>] Re: LAM: LAM/MPI v7.1 released
- To: Camm Maguire <camm@enhanced.com>
- Cc: clustalw-mpi@packages.debian.org, xmpi@packages.debian.org, tessa-mpi@packages.debian.org, scalapack-lam-test@packages.debian.org, r-cran-rmpi@packages.debian.org, netpipe-lam@packages.debian.org, libxmpi4@packages.debian.org, libhdf5-lam-1.6.2-0@packages.debian.org, lampython@packages.debian.org, lam4-dev@packages.debian.org, lam-runtime@packages.debian.org, blacs1-lam@packages.debian.org, blacs-lam-test@packages.debian.org, debian-beowulf@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: [Jeff Squyres <jsquyres@lam-mpi.org>] Re: LAM: LAM/MPI v7.1 released
- From: Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 20:05:58 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 1095876358.4248.15.camel@arrakis.localnet>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 54acvi2nsy.fsf@intech19.enhanced.com>
- References: <[🔎] 54acvi2nsy.fsf@intech19.enhanced.com>
Le mercredi 22 septembre 2004 à 13:53 -0400, Camm Maguire a écrit :
> Greetings!
>
> What say ye all to the below -- should I try to push 7.1 out with the
> same soname into Sarge ASAP?
I'd say it's a bad idea. The release team strongly advised the
developers against ABI changes - even .shlibs version bumps.
When there are such binary incompatibilities between every single
version of a library, the best solution is probably to change the SONAME
and package name between each versions, just like for libhdf5 of
libdirectfb. It's a hassle to rebuild all depending packages, but this
way you're sure there's no problem.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\
: :' : josselin.mouette@ens-lyon.org
`. `' joss@debian.org
`- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
Reply to: