Re: Building MPE for LAM.
Camm Maguire <email@example.com> immo vero scripsit
> I think this is a good idea in general, but am wondering:
> 1) is it mpich specific? wouldn't mpe-source be better?
It's from mpich source, but it is not for mpich. It is for LAM ...
So, mpe-source would be better.
> 2) So the only "binary" of the package is the tar.bz2? If so, then
> that's great.
Yes, that's what I am meaning to do.
Just tar up some portions of mpich code (because mpich tree
contains mpe tree).
> 3) Have you used mpe? Is it useful?
But most of the *shot applications don't seem to build (I can't get it to work).
MPE library works. It does profiling, and some stupid (in the sense that it is amusing)