Re: Building MPE for LAM.
Greetings! Sorry for the delay -- have been away from my mail for
I think this is a good idea in general, but am wondering:
1) is it mpich specific? wouldn't mpe-source be better?
2) So the only "binary" of the package is the tar.bz2? If so, then
that's great. If instead you are referring to a package 'whose
source package' containst the mpe source, then from my experience
packaging atlas, the build-daemon maintainers won't like this They
often don't even have apt setup on the daemons. So I'm having to
duplicate the lapack source into atlas, for example. Would love to
see some policy on this, as it appears wasteful, but it could be
that we would both need to duplicate the source if packaged in this
3) Have you used mpe? Is it useful?
Junichi Uekawa <email@example.com> writes:
> I am thinking of making
> "mpich-mpe-source" package, which contains a .tar.bz2 of
> MPE source-tree, so that LAM can extract it at build-time,
> to create MPE for LAM.
> Any thoughts?
> firstname.lastname@example.org http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
Camm Maguire email@example.com
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah