Re: Backport request for Lghttpd 1.69 for Bullseye

[Petri Riihikallio <petri.riihikallio@metis.fi>]

> I have no idea what we are waiting for, so I am uploading an unmodified
> lighttpd/1.4.69-1~bpo11+1 to bullseye-backports-sloppy first to see if
> it can go through the NEW queue in a reasonable amount of time.

Thank you!

But I have a question: Does 1.4.69 belong to sloppy as it is the same version as in bookworm?

I had figured that 1.4.72 would belong to bullseye-backports-sloppy as it is later than the version in bookworm.

(My users are instructed to create a new VM for major OS upgrades so a clean upgrade path is not an issue.)

br, Petri