On Sat, 2018-06-30 at 07:25 +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: > On Fri, 29 Jun 2018, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > Hi, > > > > as you may know backports doesn't support LTS. The main reason is that > > > most maintainers didn't want to support their packages for such a long time. > > > > > > In the last days I had the idea to introduce a new suite names -lts, i.e. > > > jessie-backports-lts. That suite starts with the handover of a release > > > to the lts team. Maintainers uploading to it should support their packages > > > over the whole lifetime of the whole LTS lifetime. > > > > > > Does that make sense? Should we introduce such a suite? > > > > Could you please announce a decision on this? I will need to upload an > > updated linux backport for jessie soon. > > I think there wasn't enough interest and we will just close jessie at all > soon. Thanks. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Nothing is ever a complete failure; it can always serve as a bad example.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part