On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:43:58AM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 09:57:30AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > > I stumbled upon some software (spoa [1]) which obviously does not build > > with zlib 1.2.8 (just tried building in stretch - works with a > > backported zlib from testing). > That seems to be due to bioparser using the new zlib features from > 1.2.11. > Maybe it is easier to adapt bioparse to the 1.2.8 zlib interface than > backporting this pretty central library? It's a pretty stable library so there's not *huge* concerns with backporting it, though obviously it'd still be a pretty big change to pull onto people's systems which they might not be enthused about.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature