On Fri, 12 Jan 2018, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Fri, 2018-01-12 at 07:50 +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > On Fri, 12 Jan 2018, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 2018-01-10 at 11:13 -0600, Xan Charbonnet wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > Is a Meltdown fix for the wheezy-backports kernel (3.16) on the way? > > > > Thanks very much! > > > > > > I'm sorry to tell you that wheezy-backports has not been supported for > > > nearly a year now. This was never widely announced (I can no longer > > > find the announcement) and I think this end-of-life was handled > > > extremely badly by the backports administrators. > > > > It was handled badly by the backporters. I really hope you don't expect > > the administrators to do the backports. There was a discussion and nearly > > noone was in favour of doing those backports. > > I was happy to continue backporting linux, but I accept that it would > be hard to explain that some small subset of packages was supported. I > don't object to the decision itself. > > > And of course we announced it - as we always do announce changes: > > > > https://backports.debian.org/news/stretch-backports/ > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-backports/2017/06/msg00055.html > > The announcement is nominally about stretch-backports, so is not > obviously relevant to someone who uses wheezy-backports. In fact, > *nowhere* does it explicitly mention wheezy-backports; several times it > mentions squeeze-backports instead. The reader has to work hard to see > that "LTS" means this is actually ending wheezy-backports as well as > squeeze-backports. > > Secondly, this message was only sent to debian-backports (general > discussion) and not to debian-backports-announce. So it's no wonder > that some users didn't see it. > > Finally, wheezy-backports remains part of the main archive, which > normally implies that it's a supported suite. It should have been > moved to archive.debian.org. The resulting error messages from "apt- > get update" would reach those users who didn't see the announcement. > > So, please make a more explicit announcement and get wheezy-backports > removed from the main archive. In fact it went to -announce. But it never left moderation (my fault). But to be fair, we also never announce support for LTS. I will write a short announcement later. Alex
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature