Re: amdgpu for jessie-backports?
Le 24/08/2016 à 00:27, Nicholas D Steeves a écrit :
> On 16 August 2016 at 09:33, Gianfranco Costamagna
> <locutusofborg@debian.org> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>> If the deep investigation you wrote about consists in passing all the auto-tests on amd64 and i386 on both stretch/sid and jessie/stable, and make a diff, it will >take a lot of time to me (considering I do not have a stretch pbuilder environment ready :( ).
>>
>> stretch/sid are already fine.
>> Jessie needs probably investigation
>>
>> if you want a stretch pbuilder...
>> pbuilder-dist stretch amd64 create
>> or
>> pbuilder-dist stretch i386 create
>>
>> end.
>>
>> G.
>>
> I ran into a proprietary piece of software that required clang & llvm
> 3.8, so gave backporting to jessie (amd64) it a try. The build seemed
> to work, as a nochange bpo of llvm-toolchain-3.8 1:3.8-2. I'm
> rebuilding it now and will post the build log when it finally
> completes...so slow... I built it using pdebuild, with pbuilderrc
> configured to use my base-jessie-backports.cow cowbuilder chroot; it
> has jessie-backports enabled, and I haven't yet investigated if the
> reason it succeeded for me was because it pulled in a backported
> dependency instead of one from stable.
>
> Does anyone know what packages need to be installed to have
> equivalence with this upstream binary?:
> http://llvm.org/releases/3.8.0/clang+llvm-3.8.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-debian8.tar.xz
They are pretty much the same. We have several patches on top but
nothing crazy.
> The reason I ask is the proprietary software package works fine with
> the upstream clang+llvm blob, but didn't work with clang-3.8,
> llvm-3.8, libclang-dev, and llvm-3.8-dev backports installed.
Could you tell me more about that?
What means "didn't work" ?
Thanks,
S
Reply to: