Re: Fwd: jessie backport for Wordpress
On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 09:41:43AM +0200, Rhonda D'Vine wrote:
> * Rodrigo Campos <rodrigo@sdfg.com.ar> [2015-06-26 17:44:36 CEST]:
> > On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 05:56:48PM +0100, Rodrigo Campos wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 04:17:14PM +0100, Rodrigo Campos wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 09:03:05PM +1000, Craig Small wrote:
> > > > > I'm happy to work with Rodrigo or others on the backports. I think
> > > > > there has been confusion about what the current state of the various
> > > > > versions of wordpress but the more the merrier I think.
> > > >
> > > > Great, thanks! I've created the package with cowbuilder, just added myself to
> > > > the Uploaders field in debian/control and added a changelog entry with "dch
> > > > --bpo".
> > > >
> > > > Any comments on the package ? Or is it ready for inclussion in jessie backports ? :)
> > > >
> > > > I'm using it in production without any problems :)
> > >
> > > Ping ?
> > >
> > > Not sure what the next step should be. Craig ? Rhonda ?
> >
> > Sorry to disturb again. But is there a concensus to accept a WP package in
> > backports ?
>
> We can't accept anything that isn't uploaded. That said, I might still
> have a bad feeling due to the history of the package both in backports
> and security wise, but I'm willing to give it a try as long as I have
> the feeling that the people who want it are also willing to do the work
> for the longer run, not just temporarily.
I think Craig and I were clear about this in past mails. What else would make
you feel that we are willing to do the work for the longer run?
> > If so, what is the next step ? Is the current package I did not following some
> > desired rule or something ?
>
> Personally, and frankly spoken, I didn't look at it because I won't
> sponsor it myself.
Craig, would you like to sponsor it? It's in mentors.
Thanks a lot,
Rodrigo
Reply to: