|
Hi Gunnar,
On Donnerstag, 10. Oktober 2013, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > upstream tarball? I perfectly understand we try to reduce code > duplication in our main archive, but introducing i.e. five packages in > Backports as a justification for not removing what upstream already > provides (and knowing for sure nothing else in Stable depends on said > library) is not such a clear gain for me.
Please, think of the kitten and put actual backports (=build from the same upstream tarballs^w^wdebian packages, just modified as needed for the backport) of whats in jessie into wheezy-backports!
It's good (not bad!) to have five more packages in backports, when they are clean and useful.
cheers, Holger |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.