<[🔎] 20131004101952.Horde.Iz3pmetfXPajZu67VfrxCg1@mail.das-netzwerkteam.de> <[🔎] 20131004133014.GB29858@gwolf.org> <[🔎] 20131005161432.GA35516@gwolf.org> <[🔎] 5253A79F.6020109@cyconet.org> <20131003134638.GB5227@trismegisto.universo> Hi, On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 03:46:38PM +0200, Raúl Sánchez Siles wrote: > I've noticed about the (just baked) backport of owncloud. Thank you very much > for it. > > Unfortunately, there are some dependencies missing. You may take a look at [0] > where I can count up to 12 dependant packages not found. > > I wonder if there's something that can be done about this. > > [0] http://packages.debian.org/wheezy-backports/owncloud Looks like this point had already been raised on debian-backports@ (thanks Mike for the pointer). https://lists.debian.org/debian-backports/2013/10/msg00006.html That makes me wonder: are the people taking care of these backports willing to take care and follow up on backports related bug reports filled against owncloud (and its build-)dependencies), such as this one? I believe it would be the best course of action, making the issue public in a place were people caring about owncloud will find information and making it easier for the people from the teams to help each other. If the answer is “no”, on the other hand, should we just close this bug report and encourage people interested into owncloud backports to file further bug reports directly into the backports mailing list following the documentation? http://backports.debian.org/Contribute/#index5h3 Regards David
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature