Re: Bug#718045: Missing dependency
On Wed, 09 Oct 2013, David Prévot wrote:
> <[🔎] 20131004101952.Horde.Iz3pmetfXPajZu67VfrxCg1@mail.das-netzwerkteam.de>
> <[🔎] 20131004133014.GB29858@gwolf.org> <[🔎] 20131005161432.GA35516@gwolf.org>
> <[🔎] 5253A79F.6020109@cyconet.org> <20131003134638.GB5227@trismegisto.universo>
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 03:46:38PM +0200, Raúl Sánchez Siles wrote:
> > I've noticed about the (just baked) backport of owncloud. Thank you very much
> > for it.
> >
> > Unfortunately, there are some dependencies missing. You may take a look at [0]
> > where I can count up to 12 dependant packages not found.
> >
> > I wonder if there's something that can be done about this.
> >
> > [0] http://packages.debian.org/wheezy-backports/owncloud
>
> Looks like this point had already been raised on debian-backports@
> (thanks Mike for the pointer).
>
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-backports/2013/10/msg00006.html
>
> That makes me wonder: are the people taking care of these backports
> willing to take care and follow up on backports related bug reports
> filled against owncloud (and its build-)dependencies), such as this one?
> I believe it would be the best course of action, making the issue public
> in a place were people caring about owncloud will find information and
> making it easier for the people from the teams to help each other.
> If the answer is “no”, on the other hand, should we just close this bug
> report and encourage people interested into owncloud backports to file
> further bug reports directly into the backports mailing list following
> the documentation?
I'll remove owncloud from backports now.
Come back if you have something tested, that some wants to support.
Alex - backports ftpmaster
Reply to: