Re: Dependency issues upgrading icedove to 10.0.12-1~bpo60+1
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013, Christopher David Howie wrote:
> I've been unable to upgrade to the latest version of icedove in bpo
> (10.0.12-1~bpo60+1) due to dependency issues. Google has suggested that
> other people are not having this problem, so I come here seeking help.
> It looks like the newer version of libcairo2 that icedove depends on
> conflicts in some way with other gnome packages; aptitude suggests that
> I either leave icedove alone, or uninstall almost every gnome-related
> Any pointers would be appreciated. Various command outputs follow.
> $ apt-cache policy icedove
> Installed: 3.1.16-1~bpo60+1
> Candidate: 10.0.12-1~bpo60+1
> Version table:
> 10.0.12-1~bpo60+1 0
> 100 http://backports.debian.org/debian-backports/
> squeeze-backports/main amd64 Packages
> 500 http://mozilla.debian.net/ squeeze-backports/icedove-esr
> amd64 Packages
> *** 3.1.16-1~bpo60+1 0
> 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
> 3.0.11-1+squeeze15 0
> 500 http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates/main amd64 Packages
> 3.0.11-1+squeeze12 0
> 500 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ squeeze/main amd64 Packages
> $ cat /etc/apt/sources.list
> deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ squeeze main contrib non-free
> deb-src http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ squeeze main contrib non-free
> deb-src http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ wheezy main contrib non-free
> deb http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates main contrib non-free
> deb-src http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates main contrib non-free
> deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ squeeze-updates main contrib non-free
> deb-src http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ squeeze-updates main contrib
> deb http://backports.debian.org/debian-backports squeeze-backports main
> contrib non-free
> deb http://mozilla.debian.net/ squeeze-backports icedove-esr
> # aptitude install icedove
there is -t squeeze-backports missing. See the docs  for details.
> IMPORTANT INFORMATION/DISCLAIMER
> This document should be read only by those persons to whom it is
> addressed. If you have received this message it was obviously addressed
> to you and therefore you can read it.
> Additionally, by sending an email to ANY of my addresses or to ANY
> mailing lists to which I am subscribed, whether intentionally or
> accidentally, you are agreeing that I am "the intended recipient," and
> that I may do whatever I wish with the contents of any message received
> from you, unless a pre-existing agreement prohibits me from so doing.
> This overrides any disclaimer or statement of confidentiality that may
> be included on your message.
did I ever said what legal bullshit those disclaimers are?