Re: sphinxsearch
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Radu,
Thanks for the discussion...I am cc'ing the debia backport list to put
this conversation in the public. As I said I am new to this, i am
currently running debian wheezy on my local machine. What are the
recommended means to setup my environment to build the backport for
squeeze?
thanks,
stephen
On lun 14 ene 2013 07:48:30 CST, Radu Spineanu wrote:
> OpenPGP: *Parts of the message have NOT been signed or encrypted*
>
> Hey Stephen,
>
> Yes, I am the maintainer of sphinxsearch. You are more than welcome to
> create a backport.
>
> All you have to do I believe is take the existing source (apt-get source
> sphinxsearch, apt-get build-dep sphinxsearch) and built it on squeeze. It
> should be pretty simple and straightforward, but if you have any question
> feel free to ask.
>
> -Cheers,
> Radu.
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Stephen Mahood <mv@cyberunions.org> wrote:
>
>>
>
> ********* *BEGIN ENCRYPTED or SIGNED PART* *********
>
> Dear Radu,
>
> My name is stephen, I am an activist with mayfirst.org and I am
> currently testing out software called littlesis that requires
> sphinxsearch 2.0.x or higher. The servers at mayfirst are currently
> running debian squeeze amd64 and I am interested in my first attempt
> to create a backport. I recently joined the backport email list and
> came across this message
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-changes/2012/04/msg02045.html for
> the i386.
>
> If there is other information that would assist in building a backport
> please let me know, again this is a first for me, so if I make
> mistakes in process please let me know...constructive criticism is
> always welcome.
>
> salud,
> stephen
>
>
> ********** *END ENCRYPTED or SIGNED PART* **********
>
>>
>
>
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=bYWR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: