On Thu, 12 Jul 2012, Philipp Kern wrote: > On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 05:43:05PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > I don't understand, we had sloppy for lenny and I thought we had consensus to > > have it again for squeeze. Sloppy was announced some tim ago: > > http://backports-master.debian.org/news/lenny-backports-sloppy_created/ > > I wasn't very happy back then either. It was sort of rushed through in > some private IRC pings about me setting it up on the wanna-build side. > All I'm saying is if it would be possible to review the arguments, > having had the experience for one cycle. It's sad that we do not > currently scale on the buildd side, but that's how it is.[1] > > (And it's likely to take a month until all buildds have implemented it, > given the current speed of any buildd updates needing to take place.) > > Kind regards > Philipp Kern > > [1] Apart from the name of the suite still being slightly off from what > I expect of Debian. What I heard from the users perspective -sloppy was a full sucess. Alex
Attachment:
pgpnhXnsEBbmf.pgp
Description: PGP signature