Re: mercurial tortoisehg nautilus-hg
Yes, very happy. I since found hgview and that helped.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 8, 2012, at 4:22 PM, Javi Merino <vicho@debian.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 12:13:36PM -0600, Javi Merino wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 05:14:54PM -0500, Nicky Perian wrote:
>>> I installed the back port mercurial to obtain hg graft functionally. I lost
>>> tortosiehg and nautilus-hg functionally.
>>> I tried to use those from testing. Big mistake. My dumbness I suspect but,
>>> I wound up having to reinstall debian.
>>>
>>> Is there a backport for tortoishg that has its Workbench?
>>
>> Ludovico, do you have any plans to backport tortoisehg 2.4-1 to
>> squeeze-backports? If not, I'll try to do it.
>
> On second thoughts, tortoisehg-nautilus depends on python-nautilus and
> python-gi which needs all the gobject-introspection stuff that's not
> in squeeze, nor in squeeze-backports.
>
> Nicky, will yo be happy with just tortoisehg, without the nautilus
> extension?
>
> Cheers,
> Javi (vicho)
>
>
Reply to: