On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 11:08:15PM -0500, Nicky wrote: > On Jul 8, 2012, at 4:22 PM, Javi Merino <vicho@debian.org> wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 12:13:36PM -0600, Javi Merino wrote: > >> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 05:14:54PM -0500, Nicky Perian wrote: > >>> I installed the back port mercurial to obtain hg graft functionally. I lost > >>> tortosiehg and nautilus-hg functionally. > >>> I tried to use those from testing. Big mistake. My dumbness I suspect but, > >>> I wound up having to reinstall debian. > >>> > >>> Is there a backport for tortoishg that has its Workbench? > >> > >> Ludovico, do you have any plans to backport tortoisehg 2.4-1 to > >> squeeze-backports? If not, I'll try to do it. > > > > On second thoughts, tortoisehg-nautilus depends on python-nautilus and > > python-gi which needs all the gobject-introspection stuff that's not > > in squeeze, nor in squeeze-backports. > > > > Nicky, will yo be happy with just tortoisehg, without the nautilus > > extension? > > Yes, very happy. I since found hgview and that helped. Ok, I've uploaded tortoisehg 2.4-1~bpo60+1 to squeeze-backports. As I said, it's only tortoisehg, without the nautilus extension. It's a new package in squeeze-backports[0] so it will have to be accepted before it's uploaded into the squeeze-backports archive. [0] http://backports-master.debian.org/dak/new.html Cheers, Javi (Vicho)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature