[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: mercurial tortoisehg nautilus-hg



On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 11:08:15PM -0500, Nicky wrote:
> On Jul 8, 2012, at 4:22 PM, Javi Merino <vicho@debian.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 12:13:36PM -0600, Javi Merino wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 05:14:54PM -0500, Nicky Perian wrote:
> >>> I installed the back port mercurial to obtain hg graft functionally. I lost
> >>> tortosiehg and nautilus-hg functionally.
> >>> I tried to use those from testing. Big mistake. My dumbness I suspect but,
> >>> I wound up having to reinstall debian.
> >>> 
> >>> Is there a backport for tortoishg that has its Workbench?
> >> 
> >> Ludovico, do you have any plans to backport tortoisehg 2.4-1 to
> >> squeeze-backports?  If not, I'll try to do it.
> > 
> > On second thoughts, tortoisehg-nautilus depends on python-nautilus and
> > python-gi which needs all the gobject-introspection stuff that's not
> > in squeeze, nor in squeeze-backports.
> > 
> > Nicky, will yo be happy with just tortoisehg, without the nautilus
> > extension?
>
> Yes, very happy. I since found hgview and that helped.

Ok, I've uploaded tortoisehg 2.4-1~bpo60+1 to squeeze-backports.  As I
said, it's only tortoisehg, without the nautilus extension.  It's a
new package in squeeze-backports[0] so it will have to be accepted
before it's uploaded into the squeeze-backports archive.

[0] http://backports-master.debian.org/dak/new.html

Cheers,
Javi (Vicho)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: