On 10/17/11 23:40, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 19:03, dE . <de.techno@gmail.com>
wrote:
You should rethink the definition of 'uninstallable'. :-D
If "cannot be installed" is not "uninstallable", what is?
The OP has a point, if mdadm in backports depends on another
package whose version is unavailable in backports, there obviously
was a mistake.
Of course, the OP could build the package himself, but then he
wouldn't need backports to help him with this…
--
Jan
Yeah who not compile from source using apt-get?
|