[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
] [
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
] [
Date Index
] [
Thread Index
]
Re: mdadm in squeeze-backports uninstallable?
To
:
debian-backports@lists.debian.org
Subject
: Re: mdadm in squeeze-backports uninstallable?
From
: Jan Ingvoldstad <
frettled@gmail.com
>
Date
: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 20:10:19 +0200
Message-id
: <
[🔎]
CAEffzkwbeKuo57gQXF=Z35xNjA9fFTUwc8qy=Pn0S1wyqWkiGQ@mail.gmail.com
>
In-reply-to
: <
[🔎]
4E9C5FF9.2090208@gmail.com
>
References
: <
[🔎]
4E9B6D79.3030202@fifthhorseman.net
> <
[🔎]
4E9BFBAF.8000707@gmail.com
> <
[🔎]
4E9C42D4.5020007@fifthhorseman.net
> <
[🔎]
4E9C5FF9.2090208@gmail.com
>
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 19:03, dE .
<
de.techno@gmail.com
>
wrote:
You should rethink the definition of 'uninstallable'. :-D
If "cannot be installed" is not "uninstallable", what is?
The OP has a point, if mdadm in backports depends on another package whose version is unavailable in backports, there obviously was a mistake.
Of course, the OP could build the package himself, but then he wouldn't need backports to help him with this…
--
Jan
Reply to:
debian-backports@lists.debian.org
Jan Ingvoldstad (on-list)
Jan Ingvoldstad (off-list)
Follow-Ups
:
Re: mdadm in squeeze-backports uninstallable?
From:
"dE ." <de.techno@gmail.com>
References
:
mdadm in squeeze-backports uninstallable?
From:
Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
Re: mdadm in squeeze-backports uninstallable?
From:
"dE ." <de.techno@gmail.com>
Re: mdadm in squeeze-backports uninstallable?
From:
Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
Re: mdadm in squeeze-backports uninstallable?
From:
"dE ." <de.techno@gmail.com>
Prev by Date:
Re: mdadm in squeeze-backports uninstallable?
Next by Date:
Re: mdadm in squeeze-backports uninstallable?
Previous by thread:
Re: mdadm in squeeze-backports uninstallable?
Next by thread:
Re: mdadm in squeeze-backports uninstallable?
Index(es):
Date
Thread