Re: Bug#587743: gnucash: segfault on open
* Alexander Reichle-Schmehl <tolimar@debian.org> [2010-09-01 14:01:30 CEST]:
> * Didier 'OdyX' Raboud <didier@raboud.com> [100901 13:57]:
> > > Is there any way, to make sure that users of the iceweasel backport, who
> > > also use gnucash, will then also get the gnucash backport, or at least a
> > > hint to install that backport?
> >
> > What about a Breaks: or Conflicts in iceweasel backport against Lenny's
> > gnucash ?
>
> Haven't tested it yet, but AFAIK Breaks isn't supported in Lenny, and a
> simple Conflicts will result in gnucash to be removed instead of
> upgraded. I'll try to test it next week, when I'm back home.
Isn't a removal solution for gnucash "a hint to install that backport"?
Btw., a Breaks should also result in a removal if no update of the
package is explicitly chosen, from what I understand.
Enjoy!
Rhonda
--
"Lediglich 11 Prozent der Arbeitgeber sind der Meinung, dass jeder
Mensch auch ein Privatleben haben sollte."
-- http://www.karriere.at/artikel/884/
Reply to: