[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: empathy backports



Andres Salomon schrieb am Dienstag, den 03. November 2009:

> On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:24:32 +0100
> Alexander Wirt <formorer@formorer.de> wrote:
> 
> > Andres Salomon schrieb am Freitag, den 30. Oktober 2009:
> > 
> > > On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 15:59:34 -0400
> > > Andres Salomon <dilinger@collabora.co.uk> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > I'm uploading a backport of empathy.  It's very much a
> > > > work-in-progress; there are newer version of dependencies that
> > > > aren't in testing yet.  I plan to update the bpo as they migrate
> > > > to testing, up until the point at which empathy 2.28 (and any
> > > > deps necessary to make voice and video calls) is backported.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Packages are still stuck in NEW; they can be found here as well:
> > > http://lunge.mit.edu/~dilinger/bpo/empathy/
> > > 
> > > Note that telepathy-haze is broken w/ the version of libpurple
> > > that's in lenny (see #553085).  I'll fix this w/ a new tp-haze
> > > backport once more of the empathy-related packages escape NEW.  In
> > > the meantime, installing the version of libpurple0 from
> > > backports.org (rather than the version that's in lenny) will allow
> > > it to work.
> > And I'm not sure if I will accept them. There are too many more or
> > less critical libs inside. Maybe I have time to test them all at the
> > weekend. 
> > 
> 
> I just had to explain to someone that they couldn't use these packages
> because there were only .debs for i386 at the url above.  :(
> 
> If bpo has a policy of not accepting certain packages, it
> would be good to have that policy published on the backports.org webpage
> so that contributors don't waste their time backporting stuff that's
> never to be accepted.
I do of course some quality checks and if I am not sure if a backport is
working properly I can reject them. That should be clear. 

You backported some critical packages like glib and dbus where I am not sure
if they are really needed and that they don't produce any trouble. 

Did you tested your backports on lenny boxes with gnome and kde? Are normal
stable packages getting uninstallable or do they have to be removed before
installing the empathy backports? 


Thanks in advance 
Alex
-- 
Alexander Wirt, formorer@formorer.de 
CC99 2DDD D39E 75B0 B0AA  B25C D35B BC99 BC7D 020A

Reply to: