Re: Please review pekwm 0.1.10-1~bpo50+1 for Lenny backports

To: backports-users@lists.backports.org
Cc: Julien Danjou <acid@debian.org>
Subject: Re: Please review pekwm 0.1.10-1~bpo50+1 for Lenny backports
From: Daniel Moerner <dmoerner@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 12:26:53 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 845514790905231226i2c584914xeeebbb2a068e0e4@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 845514790905111539u69c06894pa7ac56ba39e4a884@mail.gmail.com>
References: <845514790902231428u6380b8e4j86ddab5450eea856@mail.gmail.com> <845514790903271422u4c52707aj5858b00d54e36562@mail.gmail.com> <20090328082436.GE30558@abydos.adm.naquadah.org> <845514790905091257q5540fe14lfe83af3e97fc7cfb@mail.gmail.com> <20090509210548.GA30880@abydos.adm.naquadah.org> <845514790905091434t676818d5t8cfe9ccf63b4b93e@mail.gmail.com> <20090510075233.GJ18196@abydos.adm.naquadah.org> <845514790905101136l68c047d2uf624eb2bd1ed0a51@mail.gmail.com> <20090511180538.GG23108@abydos.adm.naquadah.org> <[🔎] 845514790905111539u69c06894pa7ac56ba39e4a884@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Daniel Moerner <dmoerner@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Debian Backporters,
>
> I was wondering if someone could review pekwm-0.1.10-1~bpo50+1 for
> upload to Lenny backports. My usual sponsor will be out of town for 2
> weeks and suggested that I ping someone else here. (His email is at
> the end of this message for reference.)

pekwm-0.1.11 has been released. I will wait until my normal sponsor
returns to push that to unstable, and then also push to backports
through him. Please do not review 0.1.10-1~bpo50+1.

Daniel Moerner

-- 
Daniel Moerner <dmoerner@gmail.com>

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Please review pekwm 0.1.10-1~bpo50+1 for Lenny backports
  - From: Daniel Moerner <dmoerner@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: OpenJDK backport
Next by Date: Re: Your package 'btrfs-tools' was sponsored
Previous by thread: Re: Please review pekwm 0.1.10-1~bpo50+1 for Lenny backports
Next by thread: linux-headers-2.6.29-bpo.2-686 problem
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread