Re: proftpd-dfsg upgrade (was: Re: Why are backports of Squeeze packages in etch-backports?)
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 09:27:07AM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> * Francesco P. Lovergine <firstname.lastname@example.org> [2009-03-08 10:55:30 CET]:
> > On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 01:18:16PM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > > * Francesco P. Lovergine <email@example.com> [2009-03-06 12:02:10 CET]:
> > > > * is the 1.3.1-15~bpo40+1 -> 1.3.1-17lenny2~bpo40+1 (wow!) the right
> > > > upgrade to consider? Or a more strict sec-only upgrade should be considered?
> > >
> > > Yes, that is the proper upgrade to consider - you might have wanted to
> > > upload 1.3.1-17 before it got touched by the security team anyway,
> > > depending on the changes.
> > Well, currently 1.3.17-1 needs fixing anyway, so I would upload
> > the current backported 1.3.17lenny2.
> ITYM 1.3.1-17lenny2, but I'm quite confident that we mean the same
> thing. :)
Yes, too long :)
Francesco P. Lovergine