proftpd-dfsg upgrade (was: Re: Why are backports of Squeeze packages in etch-backports?)
* Francesco P. Lovergine <email@example.com> [2009-03-06 12:02:10 CET]:
> While on that. Current proftpd-dfsg in bpo needs upgrading for a couple security
> issues fixed in lenny. Now, the questions:
Do you have some reference for that? I don't see proftpd listed in
> * who is in charge for that?
The same person that originally injected and is expected to maintain
the package within backports, i.e. you. :)
> * is the 1.3.1-15~bpo40+1 -> 1.3.1-17lenny2~bpo40+1 (wow!) the right
> upgrade to consider? Or a more strict sec-only upgrade should be considered?
Yes, that is the proper upgrade to consider - you might have wanted to
upload 1.3.1-17 before it got touched by the security team anyway,
depending on the changes.
So long, and thanks for taking care of it!