also sprach Alexander Wirt <formorer@formorer.de> [2008.04.27.1124 +0400]: > > This is misrepresenting. I build my packages under etch, and > > they're targeted at etch and work on etch. I build the source > > packages on sid. Etch's dpkg-source can unpack them just fine. > And your point is what? There was an unstable part in your > toolchain. Nowhere in the policy does it say anything about source packages and yet you used it as argument. > Aren't you able to understand that we want to minimise any risk? > I don't want to start to repair any things if they are broken. And > its only natural to insist on a stable toolchain, in my eyes thats > one of the central parts of backport. To have a minimum of > changes. Sure I understand that. I don't agree with it. Which is why I withdrew from backports.org, which should minimise your risk... -- .''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org> : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems always remember you're unique, just like everyone else.
Attachment:
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)