Re: Request backport of Bacula 2 for etch?
Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> * Sven Hartge <email@example.com> [2007-09-14 11:52:30 CEST]:
>> But apart from these issues, I backported 2.2.3 (using the 2.2.0
>> package and uupdate to 2.2.3) myself, removing bat and the trayicon
>> and disabling the debug_level check in src/lib/daemon.c (very crude
>> hack, I know) and it works as well as expected.
> I can just speak for myself, and the bpo policy: changes other than
> those needed to get the package building on etch won't go in. This
> is a thing that has to get addressed in the unstable/testing package
Yes, of course. I was never implying to change the code/package in the
way I did, I was just desperate to get the new version out to my servers.
> and I really hope you have sent bugreports/patches for that to the
> maintainer of bacula in Debian, given your deep insight into the
I opened a bug and reported my findings (#441621), but I still don't
knwo, why the bacula daemons behave like this since 2.2.x. Unfortunately
I don't have the time right now to single step the process startup via
gbd or to insert printfs to debug the problem any further, so this is up
Sven Hartge -- professioneller Unix-Geek
Meine Gedanken im Netz: http://www.svenhartge.de/