Re: lighttpd 1.4.13-4~bpo.1
On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 07:52:29PM -0300, Ramiro Morales wrote:
> On 4/21/07, Ramiro Morales <email@example.com> wrote:
> >Perhaps it will be better to do away with -4 and go directly for
> >1.4.13-10 that is in testing since April 9 because ...
> Forget about this part, that would result in a package
> in sarge newer than the one in etch.
This isn't as I understand it, a necessary disqualification these days.
I'll have a look at the problem - odd that I didn't observe it on my
Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/
PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email)