[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: moreutils in sarge-backports newer than in etch

Seg, 2007-04-16 às 17:10 +0200, Alexander Wirt escreveu:
> Nikita V. Youshchenko schrieb am Montag, den 16. April 2007:
> > > ..can, will or should anything be done about this?
> > > 
> > > As etch is released now, it won't likely get a moreutils-0.20...
> > > But I guess those who have already installed 0.20~bpo1 can't be helped
> > > by a change in the bpo archive anyhow...
> > 
> > I think that sarge-backports archive should be split into two.
> > One for systems that are intended to be upgraded to etch somewhen later.
> > This part should not have any packages newer than etch has.
> > Other for systems are not intended to be upgraded to etch. This one may have
> > things from current testing.
> We discussed this and the short answer is no. We don't want to administrate
> another suite. You will have to live with the problem that from now on
> sarge-bpo may destory your upgrade path to etch. I currently don't see any
> other solution. 
> Alex
i think there is no need ... who has sarge-bpo adds etch-bpo. if it has
newer packages, then just make etch-bpo has newer packages than

Reply to: