Re: Please categorise your packages for the Debian Science metapackages
On 05.01.2017 16:10, Andreas Tille wrote:
> For Debian Med its a bit different since its not only Biology. So
> adding the biology related metapackages seems somehow reasonable. I
> think the current approach works (at least I do not see any problem with
> it) so from my point of view we can leave it but I have no really strong
> opinion about it.
I just added DebiChem, Debian Med and Debian Astro as "related Blends"
to the wiki. This should prevent people from assuming there is no
astronomy here :-)