Re: Fwd: Bug#764549: ITP: siril -- Astronomical image processing tool
Dear debian-astro members,
we have had some user feedback and package improvements since the
release of the beta in debian.
What would you suggest we do for packages updates about the version
numbers for fixes to the beta that don't make it stable yet? Should it
be 0.9.0~beta-2 or 0.9.0~beta~2 or 0.9.0~beta~svn666 or even 0.9.0~rc1 ?
Are we free to modify the data stored on the git now that it's been
uploaded to debian? Is it like, I still make some changes in the debian
and upstream branches of the git and I tell you when we need to upload a
new version into debian?
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 05:22:26PM +0100, Vincent Hourdin wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 04:42:24PM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote:
> > Vincent Hourdin <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > > We finally have fixed the beta revision to upstream svn 671. I have
> > > updated the git accordingly.
> > Is this the beta version? Then you would not need the "svn671" extension
> > here.
> > > I made a new entry in the changelog, since it has been already released.
> > As long as it is not really released (it is still in NEW), I would just
> > put one entry there.
> > Would you mind if I just change both and upload?
> No problem, go ahead.
> Yes this is the beta.
> Thank you very much.
> > Best
> > Ole
> > --
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
> > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org
> > Archive: [🔎] email@example.com">https://lists.debian.org/[🔎] firstname.lastname@example.org
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org
> Archive: [🔎] 20141112162226.GH3118@vinvin.tf">https://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 20141112162226.GH3118@vinvin.tf