Re: Fwd: Bug#764549: ITP: siril -- Astronomical image processing tool
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 10:57:26AM +0200, Sergio Gelato wrote:
> * Vincent Hourdin [2014-10-19 04:05:06 +0200]:
> > I'm almost able to build the package now, I have an issue with the
> > dh_installchangelogs rule that makes the following error at the end of
> > compilation:
> > install: cannot change ownership of `debian/siril/usr/share/doc/siril/changelog.Debian': Operation not permitted
> > dh_installchangelogs: install -o 0 -g 0 -p -m644 debian/changelog debian/siril/usr/share/doc/siril/changelog.Debian returned exit code 1
>
> Odd. What is the underlying filesystem type? And are you using fakeroot?
Not using fakeroot, because when I do, I have the following error:
fakeroot: nested operation not yet supported
dpkg-buildpackage: error: fakeroot debian/rules clean gave error exit
status 1
FS is ext4.
But the probable reason why it fails would be because I don't know how
to use dh_installchangelogs!
> > The dependencies are quite a big issue I believe: in unstable
> > libtiff5-dev conflicts with libjpeg8-dev, in stable libtiff5-dev
> > conflicts with libopencv-dev that installs the libtiff4-dev, and
> > libtiff4-dev doesn't have a pkgconfig file. Which version of debian
> > should the package target? I would say testing or unstable because
>
> For uploading to the Debian repository it has to be unstable. If you can
> make backports easier by providing dependencies that work for both (feel
> free to use | to provide alternatives) that's of course a plus.
Are you able to install libjpeg-dev from jpegturbo and tiff5 and
opencv in unstable?
> > running a desktop on stable is quite silly,
>
> That's debatable. Running a deployed base of a hundred or a thousand
> desktops on stable rather than testing makes good sense. But I digress.
>
> > but I have no other distrib
> > than stable for testing, not even ubuntu or derivatives.
>
> Ideally you would persuade your sysadmins to give you a virtual machine or
> three for testing various environments. They might not be too keen due to
> the extra support load, but if you've got a good enough reason I'd expect
> them to work something out. After all, today's testing is tomorrow's stable,
> and they may have an interest in preparing for the upgrade.
I could install a virtual machine if I wanted to, but if people from
debian-astro have an unstable/testing or other debian-based rencent
systems, that would be easier, and fixing the packaging would probably
go a lot faster.
Thank you in advance ;)
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-astro-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> Archive: [🔎] 20141019085725.GA12131@hanuman.astro.su.se">https://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 20141019085725.GA12131@hanuman.astro.su.se
>
Reply to: