[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RM: icinga2 [armel mips64el ppc64el riscv64] -- ROM; FTBFS



On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 11:44 PM Sebastiaan Couwenberg
<sebastic@xs4all.nl> wrote:
>
> On 1/3/24 00:02, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On 2023-12-22 15:43, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> >> Please remove icinga2 from armel, mips64el, ppc64el, riscv64 where it FTBFS to unblock testing migration.
> >
> > What is the reasoning behind the removal, especially for riscv64 which
> > built successfully?
>
> armel:
>
>   /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/lib/base/application.hpp:148:33: error: static
> assertion failed
>
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=icinga2&arch=armel&ver=2.14.1-1&stamp=1703225119&raw=0
>
> mips64el:
>
>   152 - base-methods_pluginnotificationtask/truncate_long_output (Failed)
>
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=icinga2&arch=mips64el&ver=2.14.1-1&stamp=1704107092&raw=0
>
> ppc64el:
>
>   152 - base-methods_pluginnotificationtask/truncate_long_output (Failed)
>
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=icinga2&arch=ppc64el&ver=2.14.1-1&stamp=1703225525&raw=0
>
> riscv64:
>
>   /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/riscv64-linux-gnu/libboost_coroutine.so.1.83.0:
> undefined reference to `jump_fcontext'
> /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/riscv64-linux-gnu/libboost_coroutine.so.1.83.0:
> undefined reference to `make_fcontext'
>
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=icinga2&arch=riscv64&ver=2.14.1-1&stamp=1703250691&raw=0
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=icinga2&arch=riscv64&ver=2.14.1-1&stamp=1703201911&raw=0
>
> Only the third try built successfully.
>
> > Have you asked the porters for help before asking for the removal?
>
> Obviously not, as you would have seen that request. I assumed you have
> better things to do during Christmas season. This RM bug unblocked
> testing migration without involving even more people.
>
> The Debian servers on these architectures are likely the only users of
> the icinga2 package so it would be good to get the package to build
> there again, but it is not a priority for me. Upstream is unpleasant to
> work with and requires a CLA which I refuse to spend my time on, so
> beware of that if you intend to patch icinga2 to fix the FTBFS issues.

Also see <https://github.com/Icinga/icinga2/issues/9954>.


Reply to: