debian-arm Jan 2024 by thread
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
[next page]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Date Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
Re: RM: icinga2 [armel mips64el ppc64el riscv64] -- ROM; FTBFS
Aurelien Jarno
Re: RM: icinga2 [armel mips64el ppc64el riscv64] -- ROM; FTBFS
Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Re: RM: icinga2 [armel mips64el ppc64el riscv64] -- ROM; FTBFS
Jeffrey Walton
Nouvel employé
Joseph Parisien
Re: Nouvel employé
gestos@ftp83plus.net
Re: Nouvel employé
Paul Wise
AR9271 Raspberry Pi 2B
John Wick
Re: AR9271 Raspberry Pi 2B
Andrew M.A. Cater
Re: AR9271 Raspberry Pi 2B
Uwe Kleine-König
Re: AR9271 Raspberry Pi 2B
John Wick
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: AR9271 Raspberry Pi 2B
John Wick
What to do with d-i on armel?
Bastian Blank
Re: What to do with d-i on armel?
Emanuele Rocca
Re: What to do with d-i on armel?
Martin
Re: What to do with d-i on armel?
gene heskett
Re: What to do with d-i on armel?
Peter Green
Re: What to do with d-i on armel?
Arnd Bergmann
Future for armel? (was: Re: What to do with d-i on armel?)
Bastian Blank
Re: Future for armel? (was: Re: What to do with d-i on armel?)
Martin
Re: Future for armel? (was: Re: What to do with d-i on armel?)
Dimitri John Ledkov
Re: What to do with d-i on armel?
Ben Hutchings
Re: What to do with d-i on armel?
Arnd Bergmann
Re: What to do with d-i on armel?
Bastian Blank
Re: Really enable -fstack-clash-protection on armhf/armel?
Julian Andres Klode
Ability to further support 32bit architectures
Bastian Blank
Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures
Bastian Blank
Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures
Dimitri John Ledkov
Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures
Bastian Blank
Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures
Adrian Bunk
Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures
Aurelien Jarno
Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures
Aurelien Jarno
Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures
Jeffrey Walton
Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures
rhys
Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures
YunQiang Su
Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures
rhys
Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures
Alan Corey
Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures
gene heskett
Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures
Alan Corey
Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures
Hank Barta
Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures
Bastian Blank
Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures
Dimitri John Ledkov
Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures
Bastian Blank
Error: bad immediate value for offset (4100)
Mathieu Malaterre
Re: Error: bad immediate value for offset (4100)
Emanuele Rocca
Re: Enabling -fstack-clash-protection for trixie [armhf rebuild]
Lucas Nussbaum
Bug#1060849: mesa: FTBFS on armel: static assertion failed: "vn_ring_shared requires lock-free 32-bit atomic_uint"
Simon McVittie
Re: Bug#1061063: armhf: h5py's tests expose unaligned memory accesses during the build
Aurelien Jarno
Bug#1061370: gcc-14 ftbfs on armel
Matthias Klose
Bug#1061370: gcc-14 ftbfs on armel
Emanuele Rocca
The last update was on 09:00 GMT Wed Jan 24. There are 51 messages. Page 1 of 1.
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
[next page]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Date Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
Mail converted by
MHonArc