Re: RM: icinga2 [armel mips64el ppc64el riscv64] -- ROM; FTBFS

To: Bas Couwenberg <sebastic@xs4all.nl>
Cc: dsa@debian.org, debian-arm@lists.debian.org, debian-mips@lists.debian.org, debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: RM: icinga2 [armel mips64el ppc64el riscv64] -- ROM; FTBFS
From: Aurelien Jarno <aurel32@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 00:02:32 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] ZZSWCDWhDqwPwUR4@aurel32.net>
Mail-followup-to: Bas Couwenberg <sebastic@xs4all.nl>, dsa@debian.org, debian-arm@lists.debian.org, debian-mips@lists.debian.org, debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <170325619082.3544950.11856549067003802787.reportbug@osiris.linuxminded.xs4all.nl>
References: <170325619082.3544950.11856549067003802787.reportbug@osiris.linuxminded.xs4all.nl>

Hi,

On 2023-12-22 15:43, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> Package: ftp.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: ftp.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: remove
> X-Debbugs-Cc: icinga2@packages.debian.org
> Control: affects -1 + src:icinga2
> 
> Please remove icinga2 from armel, mips64el, ppc64el, riscv64 where it FTBFS to unblock testing migration.

What is the reasoning behind the removal, especially for riscv64 which
built successfully?

Have you asked the porters for help before asking for the removal?

Regards
Aurelien

-- 
Aurelien Jarno                          GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurelien@aurel32.net                     http://aurel32.net

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RM: icinga2 [armel mips64el ppc64el riscv64] -- ROM; FTBFS
  - From: Sebastiaan Couwenberg <sebastic@xs4all.nl>

Next by Date: Re: RM: icinga2 [armel mips64el ppc64el riscv64] -- ROM; FTBFS
Next by thread: Re: RM: icinga2 [armel mips64el ppc64el riscv64] -- ROM; FTBFS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread