Re: Cubox-i bullseye -> bookworm Upgrade failure
Am Dienstag, 29. August 2023, 17:24:30 CEST schrieb Steve Langasek:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 02:38:20PM +0200, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 15. August 2023, 21:31:50 CEST schrieb Steve Langasek:
> > > > How about alerting end-user that "did you know your interface name
> > > > will change after the reboot thus possibly breaking your network
> > > > configuration?". I heard there are certain Release Notes that were
> > > > used
> > > > to say things like that in the past ;)
> > >
> > > I think that's a very good idea. https://bugs.debian.org/release-notes
> > > ?
> >
> > That would be an improvement over the current status. Should I open a bug
> > report?
>
> I would encourage this, yes.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1050833
Justin followed up with a question:
Are you saying that armhf machines still used one of the old interface
naming schemes (https://wiki.debian.org/NetworkInterfaceNames) on
bullseye, and hadn't yet switched over to "predictable" names?
That is what I observed after installing bullseye and upgrading to bookworm.
If anybody has insight why armhf did that later, please share there. Also any
other follow-up discussion probably should happen in the bugreport.
Many thanks
Rainer
--
Rainer Dorsch
http://bokomoko.de/
Reply to: