On 2022-08-25, Graham Inggs wrote: > On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 at 13:36, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz > <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> wrote: >> it seems superficially plausible that the march=native >> invocations are just instances of the compiler being probed. > > I have also had a look and cannot see that '-march=native' is used in > the actual builds on any of the architectures. > > It would be very much appreciated if the arm porters could take a look > at this issue, as it still plagues the scikit-learn autopkgtests on > armhf [2], and currently prevents quite a number of packages from > being part of testing. It appears that armel [1] has the same error, > so hopefully one fix could resolve both. I pretty much think of myself, at best, as half an armhf/arm64 porter, but this is a little bit outside of the scope of what I offered to look after in the porter roll calls... Apparently I am the only porter for armhf and arm64? I had assumed there would be someone else to fill the gaps in my skillset, but I guess not. Help? live well, vagrant
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature