Re: Bug#1017537: armel buildd misconfiguration
Arnd Bergmann dixit:
>Yes, that sounds reasonable in principle.
OK, good. I’ll do that then when I’m caught up with dayjob work.
>I've tried to come up with a minimal test case like
Meh, I’m just going to write a main.s ;-) I like assembly.
Also, less surprises there. GCC is…
bye,
//mirabilos
--
<igli> exceptions: a truly awful implementation of quite a nice idea.
<igli> just about the worst way you could do something like that, afaic.
<igli> it's like anti-design. <mirabilos> that too… may I quote you on that?
<igli> sure, tho i doubt anyone will listen ;)
Reply to: