Re: Package guile-2.2 is not building on armel (Not-For-Us)... Why?
On Sun, Oct 07, 2018 at 02:17:35PM -0500, Rob Browning wrote:
>Paul Wise <email@example.com> writes:
>> There are some new arm64 buildds coming online soonish that are likely
>> to be used for armhf/armel too and so this restriction may be lifted
>> at some point. Until then, it might be a good idea to remove all the
>> guile binary packages from armel as well as all packages that depend
>> on them.
>Do we have any guesses about when soonish might be? I ask because I
>know the freeze is approaching, and I'd *really* like for us to avoid
>carrying guile-2.0 throughout buster if we can.
Right now I'm finishing up analysis from doing full rebuilds of the
archive for both armhf and armel on arm64 hosts. More news shortly...
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. firstname.lastname@example.org
"Arguing that you don't care about the right to privacy because you have
nothing to hide is no different than saying you don't care about free
speech because you have nothing to say."
-- Edward Snowden