Re: Package guile-2.2 is not building on armel (Not-For-Us)... Why?
Paul Wise <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> There are some new arm64 buildds coming online soonish that are likely
> to be used for armhf/armel too and so this restriction may be lifted
> at some point. Until then, it might be a good idea to remove all the
> guile binary packages from armel as well as all packages that depend
> on them.
Do we have any guesses about when soonish might be? I ask because I
know the freeze is approaching, and I'd *really* like for us to avoid
carrying guile-2.0 throughout buster if we can.
So I'm trying to figure out what still has to be done, and imagined that
this might be one of the relevant bits. e.g. does this interfere with
uploads of packages trying to migrate from guile-2.0 to guile-2.2?
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4