Steve McIntyre: > [...] >>>> - armel has a RT concern about lack of buildds (only 2) >>>> >>> I think this is outdated, my understanding is that armel and armhf are >>> now using a shared buildd pool. I see arnold, hoiby, henze, hasse, >>> antheil and hartmann recently active on the armel buildd page and the >>> same on the armhf page. >> >> Ok, so a total of 6 shared between the two architectures? > > Correct. We'll also have the possibility of arm64 machines building > armhf at some point - arm64 server machines are starting to appear and > are much better designed for this kind of workload. > Ok. I have re-shuffled the buildds so there are now 3 for each port and removed the RM concern for now. I am hoping DSA will follow up on the remote power and the management concerns. Thanks, ~Niels
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature