Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

[Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com>]

On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 01:38:06PM +0000, Niels Thykier wrote:
>peter green:
>> On 05/06/16 11:01, Niels Thykier wrote:
>>> all arm ports have DSA concerns.
>>>    
>> Is there a current reference to what these concerns are? Is there still
>> a lack of out of band management? (the old mail I found on the topic
>> said it was "being worked on", sledge whats the status here?) are there
>> other concerns?
>
>https://release.debian.org/stretch/arch_qualify.html is what I know of.

Hmmm, OK.

>>>     - armel has a RT concern about lack of buildds (only 2)
>>>    
>> I think this is outdated, my understanding is that armel and armhf are
>> now using a shared buildd pool. I see arnold, hoiby, henze, hasse,
>> antheil and hartmann recently active on the armel buildd page and the
>> same on the armhf page.
>
>Ok, so a total of 6 shared between the two architectures?

Correct. We'll also have the possibility of arm64 machines building
armhf at some point - arm64 server machines are starting to appear and
are much better designed for this kind of workload.

-- 
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.                                steve@einval.com
< sladen> I actually stayed in a hotel and arrived to find a post-it
          note stuck to the mini-bar saying "Paul: This fridge and
          fittings are the correct way around and do not need altering"