On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 01:39:40AM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 11:41 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Could you be more specific as to what you believe the problem that
> > exists is? You mentioned that the kernel would be tainted but that
> > doesn't seem like a not working thing...
> The problem explained in the commit message for commit
> 3f1a91aa25579ba5e7268a47a73d2a83e4802c62.
That's "ASoC: fsl: Fix module build".
> imx-pcm-{dma,fiq}.o are exporting various symbols used by
> snd-soc-{fsl,imx}-ssi.o. Obviously, a module can use symbols exported
> from both built-in and modular code. And yet for some reason this
> didn't work when the exports were built-in and did work when they were
> built as modules.
I'm afraid I still lack the context to understand what the issue you're
trying to report here is, possibly because I've forgotten some of the
context from earlier on in the thread. That commit is fixing the fact
that the relevant functions were ifdefed with CONFIG_FOO but not
CONFIG_FOO_MODULE but it seems to fix that fairly directly?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature