[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Build failure for armhf/armmp, linux 3.11-rc4

On Fri, 2013-08-16 at 11:34 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On 16 August 2013 09:42, Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> wrote:
> Please use the advertised e-mail addresses for maintainers.

Expand, please?  I took your address from the commit that Robert pointed

>         On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 19:16 -0500, Robert Nelson wrote:
>         > This is fixed in the sound next branch:
>         >
>         >
>         https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git/commit/?h=for-next&id=3f1a91aa25579ba5e7268a47a73d2a83e4802c62
>         The explanation doesn't make sense to me.
>         And if these files are built and then loaded as modules, they
>         will taint
>         the kernel as they have no MODULE_LICENSE.
> I doubt many people are actually building them as modules except for
> compile testing or with another reason for the kernel to be tainted.

In a multi-platform config I think this will now be the *normal* state,
as the dependent drivers should be modules.

I'm still failing to see *how* that fix works, anyway.  Seems like a
workaround for some other problem.


>         # CONFIG_SND_SOC_IMX_WM8962 is not set
> There seem to be a reasonable number of boards out there using that
> driver. 

Ben Hutchings
Teamwork is essential - it allows you to blame someone else.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: